Esteemed readers
Pls go to my site:
http://highereducationinmalaysia.wordpress.com/
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
The case is Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khatthum and Boto v Jaafar.:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050612
Yes, the civil court have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims. It has been proved by two leading cases which the civil court has preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian. The case is Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khatthum and Boto v Jaafar.
In Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khalthum, the spouses had bought a matrimonial home for RM50,000. The husband contribute RM40,000 and the wife RM10,000. The house was named under the wife. After the dissolution of marriage or divorce, the husband apply that the house to be divided equally among them. The wife was not agree to this claims. The court held that the asset must be divided equally among them.In Boto v Jaafar, the husband and wife was marry in 1966. During the subsistence of marriage, they was bought a house, a piece of land, four fishing boats and one fish stall. The husband run a fishing business. After the divorce, the wife was claim the Harta Sepencarian.
Salleh Abas CJ held that the assets must be divided among them although the wife was not contribute to bought that assets. The wife was give an indirect contribution as she responsible to keep the peace of mind of to her husband to run the fishing business with proper sense. The court held that one-third of the assets was divide to the plaintiff and two-third for the defendant. The one-third division is for the indirectly contribution by the plaintiff to support the plaintiff’s fishing business.[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of Eleven(11)]
Yes, the civil court have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims. It has been proved by two leading cases which the civil court has preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian. The case is Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khatthum and Boto v Jaafar.
In Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khalthum, the spouses had bought a matrimonial home for RM50,000. The husband contribute RM40,000 and the wife RM10,000. The house was named under the wife. After the dissolution of marriage or divorce, the husband apply that the house to be divided equally among them. The wife was not agree to this claims. The court held that the asset must be divided equally among them.In Boto v Jaafar, the husband and wife was marry in 1966. During the subsistence of marriage, they was bought a house, a piece of land, four fishing boats and one fish stall. The husband run a fishing business. After the divorce, the wife was claim the Harta Sepencarian.
Salleh Abas CJ held that the assets must be divided among them although the wife was not contribute to bought that assets. The wife was give an indirect contribution as she responsible to keep the peace of mind of to her husband to run the fishing business with proper sense. The court held that one-third of the assets was divide to the plaintiff and two-third for the defendant. The one-third division is for the indirectly contribution by the plaintiff to support the plaintiff’s fishing business.[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of Eleven(11)]
which the civil court has preside :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050612
Yes, the civil court have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims. It has been proved by two leading cases which the civil court has preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian. The case is Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khatthum and Boto v Jaafar.
In Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khalthum, the spouses had bought a matrimonial home for RM50,000. The husband contribute RM40,000 and the wife RM10,000. The house was named under the wife. After the dissolution of marriage or divorce, the husband apply that the house to be divided equally among them. The wife was not agree to this claims. The court held that the asset must be divided equally among them.In Boto v Jaafar, the husband and wife was marry in 1966. During the subsistence of marriage, they was bought a house, a piece of land, four fishing boats and one fish stall. The husband run a fishing business. After the divorce, the wife was claim the Harta Sepencarian.
Salleh Abas CJ held that the assets must be divided among them although the wife was not contribute to bought that assets. The wife was give an indirect contribution as she responsible to keep the peace of mind of to her husband to run the fishing business with proper sense. The court held that one-third of the assets was divide to the plaintiff and two-third for the defendant. The one-third division is for the indirectly contribution by the plaintiff to support the plaintiff’s fishing business.[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of Eleven(11)]
Yes, the civil court have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims. It has been proved by two leading cases which the civil court has preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian. The case is Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khatthum and Boto v Jaafar.
In Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khalthum, the spouses had bought a matrimonial home for RM50,000. The husband contribute RM40,000 and the wife RM10,000. The house was named under the wife. After the dissolution of marriage or divorce, the husband apply that the house to be divided equally among them. The wife was not agree to this claims. The court held that the asset must be divided equally among them.In Boto v Jaafar, the husband and wife was marry in 1966. During the subsistence of marriage, they was bought a house, a piece of land, four fishing boats and one fish stall. The husband run a fishing business. After the divorce, the wife was claim the Harta Sepencarian.
Salleh Abas CJ held that the assets must be divided among them although the wife was not contribute to bought that assets. The wife was give an indirect contribution as she responsible to keep the peace of mind of to her husband to run the fishing business with proper sense. The court held that one-third of the assets was divide to the plaintiff and two-third for the defendant. The one-third division is for the indirectly contribution by the plaintiff to support the plaintiff’s fishing business.[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of Eleven(11)]
has been proved : USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050612
Yes, the civil court have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims. It has been proved by two leading cases which the civil court has preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian. The case is Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khatthum and Boto v Jaafar.
In Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khalthum, the spouses had bought a matrimonial home for RM50,000. The husband contribute RM40,000 and the wife RM10,000. The house was named under the wife. After the dissolution of marriage or divorce, the husband apply that the house to be divided equally among them. The wife was not agree to this claims. The court held that the asset must be divided equally among them.In Boto v Jaafar, the husband and wife was marry in 1966. During the subsistence of marriage, they was bought a house, a piece of land, four fishing boats and one fish stall. The husband run a fishing business. After the divorce, the wife was claim the Harta Sepencarian.
Salleh Abas CJ held that the assets must be divided among them although the wife was not contribute to bought that assets. The wife was give an indirect contribution as she responsible to keep the peace of mind of to her husband to run the fishing business with proper sense. The court held that one-third of the assets was divide to the plaintiff and two-third for the defendant. The one-third division is for the indirectly contribution by the plaintiff to support the plaintiff’s fishing business.[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of Eleven(11)]
Yes, the civil court have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims. It has been proved by two leading cases which the civil court has preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian. The case is Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khatthum and Boto v Jaafar.
In Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khalthum, the spouses had bought a matrimonial home for RM50,000. The husband contribute RM40,000 and the wife RM10,000. The house was named under the wife. After the dissolution of marriage or divorce, the husband apply that the house to be divided equally among them. The wife was not agree to this claims. The court held that the asset must be divided equally among them.In Boto v Jaafar, the husband and wife was marry in 1966. During the subsistence of marriage, they was bought a house, a piece of land, four fishing boats and one fish stall. The husband run a fishing business. After the divorce, the wife was claim the Harta Sepencarian.
Salleh Abas CJ held that the assets must be divided among them although the wife was not contribute to bought that assets. The wife was give an indirect contribution as she responsible to keep the peace of mind of to her husband to run the fishing business with proper sense. The court held that one-third of the assets was divide to the plaintiff and two-third for the defendant. The one-third division is for the indirectly contribution by the plaintiff to support the plaintiff’s fishing business.[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of Eleven(11)]
the civil court have :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050612
Yes, the civil court have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims. It has been proved by two leading cases which the civil court has preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian. The case is Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khatthum and Boto v Jaafar.
In Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khalthum, the spouses had bought a matrimonial home for RM50,000. The husband contribute RM40,000 and the wife RM10,000. The house was named under the wife. After the dissolution of marriage or divorce, the husband apply that the house to be divided equally among them. The wife was not agree to this claims. The court held that the asset must be divided equally among them.In Boto v Jaafar, the husband and wife was marry in 1966. During the subsistence of marriage, they was bought a house, a piece of land, four fishing boats and one fish stall. The husband run a fishing business. After the divorce, the wife was claim the Harta Sepencarian.
Salleh Abas CJ held that the assets must be divided among them although the wife was not contribute to bought that assets. The wife was give an indirect contribution as she responsible to keep the peace of mind of to her husband to run the fishing business with proper sense. The court held that one-third of the assets was divide to the plaintiff and two-third for the defendant. The one-third division is for the indirectly contribution by the plaintiff to support the plaintiff’s fishing business.[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of Eleven(11)]
Yes, the civil court have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims. It has been proved by two leading cases which the civil court has preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian. The case is Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khatthum and Boto v Jaafar.
In Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khalthum, the spouses had bought a matrimonial home for RM50,000. The husband contribute RM40,000 and the wife RM10,000. The house was named under the wife. After the dissolution of marriage or divorce, the husband apply that the house to be divided equally among them. The wife was not agree to this claims. The court held that the asset must be divided equally among them.In Boto v Jaafar, the husband and wife was marry in 1966. During the subsistence of marriage, they was bought a house, a piece of land, four fishing boats and one fish stall. The husband run a fishing business. After the divorce, the wife was claim the Harta Sepencarian.
Salleh Abas CJ held that the assets must be divided among them although the wife was not contribute to bought that assets. The wife was give an indirect contribution as she responsible to keep the peace of mind of to her husband to run the fishing business with proper sense. The court held that one-third of the assets was divide to the plaintiff and two-third for the defendant. The one-third division is for the indirectly contribution by the plaintiff to support the plaintiff’s fishing business.[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of Eleven(11)]
the court held, the case retried:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050617
This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]
This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
must trial with witness:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050617
This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]
This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]
on the influenced by the Black Magic :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050617
This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]
This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]
the lower court must determined :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050617
This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]
This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]
The court give judgement :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050617
This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]
This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]
they appealed to appeal court:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050617
This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]
This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]
that talaq is consider as 3 talaq:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050617
This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]
This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]
Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050617
This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]
This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]
the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050617
This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]
This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]
Monday, May 25, 2009
The issue here whether:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050617
This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]
This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]
husband pronouce talaq to his wife: World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050617
This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]
This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]
Sunday, May 24, 2009
which is discussing it in big room :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050629
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.
Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.
As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.
Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.
As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
which is discussing in little room:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050629
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.
Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.
As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.
Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.
As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
the civil court also have the jurisdiction:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050629
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.
Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.
As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.
Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.
As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050629
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.
Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.
As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.
Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.
As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
towards acquiring of the assets :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050629
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.
Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.
As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.
Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.
As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
arbour:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050629
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.
Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.
As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.
Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.
As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
in contribute her husband in money:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050629
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’. As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims. [Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’. As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims. [Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
Saturday, May 23, 2009
if she did not active :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050629
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.
Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.
As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.
Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.
As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
larbour: World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050629
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.
Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.
As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.
Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.
As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050629
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.
Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.
As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.
Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.
As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
the civil court may give the wife more than husband :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050629
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.
Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.
As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.
Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.
As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
the equality of division property jointly acquired : World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050629
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.
Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.
As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.
Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.
As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
it is discussing in little room: World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050629
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different. For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’. As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different. For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’. As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
The civil court also have the jurisdiction:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050629
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.
Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.
As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.
For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.
Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.
As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.
[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]
not have a back ground of Islamic Law: World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer of USIM Third Year LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground: World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
their judgment will be re-examination:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
their judgment will be re-examination:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
without any hesitate:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
It is also give a rise that :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
to re-examined:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
This article avoid the power of Civil Court :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
should not be interfere :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
The power of Syariah Court:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
esspecially :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
should not be have any interference:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
two court :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
the unique law that consist of :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
our country have the unique law:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
without any interference from civil court:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
the harta sepencarian will be devided equally:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
and also the need of the minor children :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Clause (4) of the section also give the power :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
the power of court to exercising: World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
This section provide: World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
it’s stated on section 58: World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
The Court have a power: World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
the court consideration and discrection: World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Shariah Court have the power: World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
among Muslim: World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction: World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM LAW Undergraduate
Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050624
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
Civil court have no jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslim since Shariah Court have the power to divide the said property by the court consideration and discrection. The Court have a power to order division of harta sepencarian as it’s stated on section 58 of IFLA 1984. This section provide the power of court to exercising for division of the property. Clause (4) of the section also give the power to the court to take into consideration the contribution made by the parties during marriage and also the need of the minor children of the marriage. This section clearly illustrated to us that the Syariah Court have enough jurisdiction to make sure that the harta sepencarian will be devided equally among the both parties.
In article 121 (1) A of Federal Constitution also provide the power of Syariah Court in order to give judgment in the case without any interference from civil court. Since our country have the unique law that consist of two court the jurisdiction of each court should not be have any interference by the other court. The jurisdiction of Syariah Court is to give a muslim an opportunity to be tried in Islamic law esspecially in family matters. The power of Syariah Court to settle any dispute among Muslim should not be interfere by any other parties. The amendment of article 121 of Federal Constitution give a big effect to the jurisdiction of Syariah Court to give the judgment. This article avoid the power of Civil Court to re-examined the Syariah Court judgement. It is also give a rise that the Syariah Judges may make their judgment accordingly to Hukum Syarak without any hesitate that their judgment will be re-examination by the Civil Court judges that is not have a back ground of Islamic Law.
[Marks earned: Four point Five (4.5) out of 11 marks]
period of pregnants: World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Undergraduate Second Year
Sample answer by USIM undergraduate 1060595
The instances of Talaq Bain Kubra is the husband pronounced the divorce during the wife pregnant and already consumption When the husband divorce her wife during the pregnant the talaq not effected until the born of baby. The husband can revocked divorce during period of pregnants.
The instances of Talaq Bain Kubra is the husband pronounced the divorce during the wife pregnant and already consumption When the husband divorce her wife during the pregnant the talaq not effected until the born of baby. The husband can revocked divorce during period of pregnants.
The husband can revocked divorce: World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Undergraduate Second Year
Sample answer by USIM undergraduate 1060595
The instances of Talaq Bain Kubra is the husband pronounced the divorce during the wife pregnant and already consumption When the husband divorce her wife during the pregnant the talaq not effected until the born of baby. The husband can revocked divorce during period of pregnants.
The instances of Talaq Bain Kubra is the husband pronounced the divorce during the wife pregnant and already consumption When the husband divorce her wife during the pregnant the talaq not effected until the born of baby. The husband can revocked divorce during period of pregnants.
When the husband divorce her wife during the pregnant : World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Undergraduate Second Year
Sample answer by USIM undergraduate 1060595
The instances of Talaq Bain Kubra is the husband pronounced the divorce during the wife pregnant and already consumption When the husband divorce her wife during the pregnant the talaq not effected until the born of baby. The husband can revocked divorce during period of pregnants.
The instances of Talaq Bain Kubra is the husband pronounced the divorce during the wife pregnant and already consumption When the husband divorce her wife during the pregnant the talaq not effected until the born of baby. The husband can revocked divorce during period of pregnants.
until the born of baby: World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Undergraduate Second Year
Sample answer by USIM undergraduate 1060595
The instances of Talaq Bain Kubra is the husband pronounced the divorce during the wife pregnant and already consumption When the husband divorce her wife during the pregnant the talaq not effected until the born of baby. The husband can revocked divorce during period of pregnants.
The instances of Talaq Bain Kubra is the husband pronounced the divorce during the wife pregnant and already consumption When the husband divorce her wife during the pregnant the talaq not effected until the born of baby. The husband can revocked divorce during period of pregnants.
during the wife pregnant!! World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Undergraduate Second Year
Sample answer by USIM undergraduate 1060595
The instances of Talaq Bain Kubra is the husband pronounced the divorce during the wife pregnant and already consumption When the husband divorce her wife during the pregnant the talaq not effected until the born of baby. The husband can revocked divorce during period of pregnants.
Her Wife!!! World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Undergraduate Second Year
Sample answer by USIM undergraduate 1060595
The instances of Talaq Bain Kubra is the husband pronounced the divorce during the wife pregnant and already consumption When the husband divorce her wife during the pregnant the talaq not effected until the born of baby. The husband can revocked divorce during period of pregnants.
The instances of Talaq Bain Kubra is the husband pronounced the divorce during the wife pregnant and already consumption When the husband divorce her wife during the pregnant the talaq not effected until the born of baby. The husband can revocked divorce during period of pregnants.
Friday, May 22, 2009
Jawapan daripada Professor Dato’ Radin Umar PhD, P.Eng,FASc kepada email Dr Tam Weng Wah, Please take note that he did not cc the email to me
From: radinumx@mohe.gov.my [mailto:radinumx@mohe.gov.my]>
Sent: Fri 06/03/2009 11:23>
To: Dr. Tam Weng Wah; Mohd Asri bin Mohamed; myk@mohe.gov.my>
Cc: sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my; myk@mohe.gov.my;> pendaftar@usim.edu.my; nc@usim.edu.my; dekanfsu@usim.edu.my;> mnizam@usim.edu.my; tnc.hea@usim.edu.my; Md. Zin bin Musa; Aziz bin Ismail>
Subject: RE: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah>
Terima kasih. Datuk Yusuf TKP akan menyediakan kronologi sejarah dan tindakan-tindakan yang telah dilakukan oleh KPT.>>Terima kasih.>>>>>> ___________________________>>
Professor Dato’ Radin Umar PhD, P.Eng,FASc>> Director General>> Department of Higher Education Malaysia>> Block E9, Parcel E, 62505 Putrajaya>> Malaysia
From: Dr. Tam Weng Wah [mailto:tam@bpa.jpm.my]>
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 9:08 AM>
To: Mohd Asri bin Mohamed>
Cc: myself; sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my;> radinumx@mohe.gov.my; myk@mohe.gov.my; pendaftar@usim.edu.my;> nc@usim.edu.my; dekanfsu@usim.edu.my; mnizam@usim.edu.my;> tnc.hea@usim.edu.my; Md. Zin bin Musa; Aziz bin Ismail>
Subject: RE: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak> efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah>>>>
KPP (A4),>>>>
Harap dapat kerjasama KPT untuk memberi maklum balas terus kepada pengadu> terhadap perkara ini.>
Sekian, terima kasih.>
KP>
From: myself
> Sent: Fri 06/03/2009 7:59> To: Dr. Tam Weng Wah>
Cc: sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my; radinumx@mohe.gov.my;> myk@mohe.gov.my; pendaftar@usim.edu.my; nc@usim.edu.my;> dekanfsu@usim.edu.my; mnizam@usim.edu.my; tnc.hea@usim.edu.myMailing List>
Subject: Fw: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak> efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah>>
Dr Tam Weng Wah>>
KETUA PENGARAH>>
BIRO PENGADUAN AWAM,>>>>
Dilampirkan di sini email saya yang dihantar pada 9 September 2008 kepada> KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN PENGAJIAN TINGGI, Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi> Y.BHG. PROF. DATO’ IR. DR. RADIN UMAR BIN RADIN SOHADI dimana saya telah> mencapai ketepuan sabar (sudah tidak tahan lagi menanggung kesabaran> tetapi belum letak jawatan) kerana ketiga-tiga ketua saya iaitu En> Muhammad Nizam Awang @ Ali, Prof Dr Haji Abdul Samat Musa dan Prof Dato’ Dr Muhamad Muda telah memperlakukan saya dengan biadap dan tidak adil. Saya telah menghantar bersama email tersebut, 3 pucuk surat berikut yang mengandungi maklumat terperinci apa yang diperlakukan oleh ketiga-tiga ketua saya.>>>> Surat kepada En Muhammad Nizam Awang @ Ali, Ketua Program SMSU>> Tarikh 28th August 2008>Tajuk Surat Meeting on 25th August 2008 and other meetings..>> >Surat kepada Prof Dr Haji Abdul Samat Musa > Dekan FSU>Tarikh 28th August 2008Tajuk Surat Refusal to mark exam paper of one student >>Surat kepada Prof Dato’ Dr Muhamad Muda Timbalan Naib Canselor USIM>Tarikh 28th August 2008Tajuk Surat Request for official letter to leave USIM>Untuk makluman Tuan pihak KPT (melalui Timbalan Pengarah Datuk Prof. Mohd Yusof Bin Kasim) dalam surat bertarikh 3 Februari 2009 yang bertajuk “KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP PENSYARAH DI UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA” tidak MENYENTUH LANGSUNG ISI KANDUNGAN EMAIL SAYA YANG SAYA HANTAR KEPADA etua Pengarah KPT Prof Dato Radin Umar pada 9 September 2008 tersebut (yang saya hantar kepada Tuan hari ini).
Pada perenggan 4 surat tersebut, pihak KPT menulis: ”Setelah mengambil kira kesemua aspek perbincangan antara saya, Puan dan juga Pengurusan USIM, saya mendapati bahawa tidak timbul sebarang salah laku dari aspek perundangan berhubung kes Puan.”>>>> Tuan Dr Tam,>>>> Diharap dapat membantu saya mendapat keadilan sewajarnya kerana> berdasarkan surat daripada pihak KPT bertarikh 3 Februari 2009, aduan saya dalam bentuk email saya yang dihantar pada 9 September 2008 tidak disentuh langsung. Saya membuat kesimpulan apabila sesuatu aduan itu tidak disentuh langsung, ini bermakna aduan tersebut sama ada:>> 1. Tidak diambil kira, atau.> 2. Diambil kira tetapi aduan itu dianggap sebagai tidak munasabah oleh> pihak KPT kerana kelakuan biadap ketua-ketua UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA tersebut dianggap wajar oleh pihak KPT, (KALAU SUDAH DIAMBIL KIRA KENAPA PIHAK KPT TIDAK SENTUH LANGSUNG DALAM SURAT BERTARIKH 3 FEBRUARI> 2009) atau..> 3. Pihak KPT tidak peduli sama ada saya diperlakukan dengan biadap atau tidak, atau.> 4. Pihak KPT menganggap saya sebagai pengadu bercakap bohong lalumereka-reka cerita, atau> 5. Pihak KPT tidak mempunyai bidang kuasa melayan aduan pensyarah.> 6. Pihak KPT tidak menganggap kelakuan ketua-ketua UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA tersebut sebagai biadap.
Tuan Dr Tan, saya mohon bantuan Tuan. Terima kasih.>>>> —–
Forwarded Message —-> From: myself>
To: radinumx@mohe..gov.my>
Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2008 8:16:00 AM>
Subject: Re: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak> efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah>>
Assalamualaikum Dato>>>>
Selamat Menyambut Ramadan . I would like to apprise Dato my latest> development at USIM. I have reached the end of my tether. Attached are the> letters which are self explanatory. I am writing to Dato as I am of the> view that my superiors are acting without impunity.>> Thank you.
(3 documents were attached)
Sent: Fri 06/03/2009 11:23>
To: Dr. Tam Weng Wah; Mohd Asri bin Mohamed; myk@mohe.gov.my>
Cc: sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my; myk@mohe.gov.my;> pendaftar@usim.edu.my; nc@usim.edu.my; dekanfsu@usim.edu.my;> mnizam@usim.edu.my; tnc.hea@usim.edu.my; Md. Zin bin Musa; Aziz bin Ismail>
Subject: RE: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah>
Terima kasih. Datuk Yusuf TKP akan menyediakan kronologi sejarah dan tindakan-tindakan yang telah dilakukan oleh KPT.>>Terima kasih.>>>>>> ___________________________>>
Professor Dato’ Radin Umar PhD, P.Eng,FASc>> Director General>> Department of Higher Education Malaysia>> Block E9, Parcel E, 62505 Putrajaya>> Malaysia
From: Dr. Tam Weng Wah [mailto:tam@bpa.jpm.my]>
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 9:08 AM>
To: Mohd Asri bin Mohamed>
Cc: myself; sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my;> radinumx@mohe.gov.my; myk@mohe.gov.my; pendaftar@usim.edu.my;> nc@usim.edu.my; dekanfsu@usim.edu.my; mnizam@usim.edu.my;> tnc.hea@usim.edu.my; Md. Zin bin Musa; Aziz bin Ismail>
Subject: RE: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak> efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah>>>>
KPP (A4),>>>>
Harap dapat kerjasama KPT untuk memberi maklum balas terus kepada pengadu> terhadap perkara ini.>
Sekian, terima kasih.>
KP>
From: myself
> Sent: Fri 06/03/2009 7:59> To: Dr. Tam Weng Wah>
Cc: sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my; radinumx@mohe.gov.my;> myk@mohe.gov.my; pendaftar@usim.edu.my; nc@usim.edu.my;> dekanfsu@usim.edu.my; mnizam@usim.edu.my; tnc.hea@usim.edu.myMailing List>
Subject: Fw: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak> efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah>>
Dr Tam Weng Wah>>
KETUA PENGARAH>>
BIRO PENGADUAN AWAM,>>>>
Dilampirkan di sini email saya yang dihantar pada 9 September 2008 kepada> KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN PENGAJIAN TINGGI, Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi> Y.BHG. PROF. DATO’ IR. DR. RADIN UMAR BIN RADIN SOHADI dimana saya telah> mencapai ketepuan sabar (sudah tidak tahan lagi menanggung kesabaran> tetapi belum letak jawatan) kerana ketiga-tiga ketua saya iaitu En> Muhammad Nizam Awang @ Ali, Prof Dr Haji Abdul Samat Musa dan Prof Dato’ Dr Muhamad Muda telah memperlakukan saya dengan biadap dan tidak adil. Saya telah menghantar bersama email tersebut, 3 pucuk surat berikut yang mengandungi maklumat terperinci apa yang diperlakukan oleh ketiga-tiga ketua saya.>>>> Surat kepada En Muhammad Nizam Awang @ Ali, Ketua Program SMSU>> Tarikh 28th August 2008>Tajuk Surat Meeting on 25th August 2008 and other meetings..>> >Surat kepada Prof Dr Haji Abdul Samat Musa > Dekan FSU>Tarikh 28th August 2008Tajuk Surat Refusal to mark exam paper of one student >>Surat kepada Prof Dato’ Dr Muhamad Muda Timbalan Naib Canselor USIM>Tarikh 28th August 2008Tajuk Surat Request for official letter to leave USIM>Untuk makluman Tuan pihak KPT (melalui Timbalan Pengarah Datuk Prof. Mohd Yusof Bin Kasim) dalam surat bertarikh 3 Februari 2009 yang bertajuk “KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP PENSYARAH DI UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA” tidak MENYENTUH LANGSUNG ISI KANDUNGAN EMAIL SAYA YANG SAYA HANTAR KEPADA etua Pengarah KPT Prof Dato Radin Umar pada 9 September 2008 tersebut (yang saya hantar kepada Tuan hari ini).
Pada perenggan 4 surat tersebut, pihak KPT menulis: ”Setelah mengambil kira kesemua aspek perbincangan antara saya, Puan dan juga Pengurusan USIM, saya mendapati bahawa tidak timbul sebarang salah laku dari aspek perundangan berhubung kes Puan.”>>>> Tuan Dr Tam,>>>> Diharap dapat membantu saya mendapat keadilan sewajarnya kerana> berdasarkan surat daripada pihak KPT bertarikh 3 Februari 2009, aduan saya dalam bentuk email saya yang dihantar pada 9 September 2008 tidak disentuh langsung. Saya membuat kesimpulan apabila sesuatu aduan itu tidak disentuh langsung, ini bermakna aduan tersebut sama ada:>> 1. Tidak diambil kira, atau.> 2. Diambil kira tetapi aduan itu dianggap sebagai tidak munasabah oleh> pihak KPT kerana kelakuan biadap ketua-ketua UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA tersebut dianggap wajar oleh pihak KPT, (KALAU SUDAH DIAMBIL KIRA KENAPA PIHAK KPT TIDAK SENTUH LANGSUNG DALAM SURAT BERTARIKH 3 FEBRUARI> 2009) atau..> 3. Pihak KPT tidak peduli sama ada saya diperlakukan dengan biadap atau tidak, atau.> 4. Pihak KPT menganggap saya sebagai pengadu bercakap bohong lalumereka-reka cerita, atau> 5. Pihak KPT tidak mempunyai bidang kuasa melayan aduan pensyarah.> 6. Pihak KPT tidak menganggap kelakuan ketua-ketua UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA tersebut sebagai biadap.
Tuan Dr Tan, saya mohon bantuan Tuan. Terima kasih.>>>> —–
Forwarded Message —-> From: myself>
To: radinumx@mohe..gov.my>
Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2008 8:16:00 AM>
Subject: Re: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak> efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah>>
Assalamualaikum Dato>>>>
Selamat Menyambut Ramadan . I would like to apprise Dato my latest> development at USIM. I have reached the end of my tether. Attached are the> letters which are self explanatory. I am writing to Dato as I am of the> view that my superiors are acting without impunity.>> Thank you.
(3 documents were attached)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)