tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38129182246395818862024-02-09T03:32:26.860+08:00higher education in Malaysiahigher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.comBlogger159125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3812918224639581886.post-78839819352272720952009-05-27T11:13:00.000+08:002009-05-27T11:14:15.599+08:00http://highereducationinmalaysia.wordpress.com/Esteemed readers<br /><br />Pls go to my site:<br /><a href="http://highereducationinmalaysia.wordpress.com/wp-admin/post-new.php">http://highereducationinmalaysia.wordpress.com/</a>higher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3812918224639581886.post-73480591805206279962009-05-27T08:45:00.000+08:002009-05-27T08:46:46.187+08:00The case is Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khatthum and Boto v Jaafar.:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW UndergraduateSample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050612<br /><br />Yes, the civil court have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims. It has been proved by two leading cases which the civil court has preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian. <span style="color:#ff0000;">The case is Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khatthum and Boto v Jaafar.<br /></span>In Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khalthum, the spouses had bought a matrimonial home for RM50,000. The husband contribute RM40,000 and the wife RM10,000. The house was named under the wife. After the dissolution of marriage or divorce, the husband apply that the house to be divided equally among them. The wife was not agree to this claims. The court held that the asset must be divided equally among them.In Boto v Jaafar, the husband and wife was marry in 1966. During the subsistence of marriage, they was bought a house, a piece of land, four fishing boats and one fish stall. The husband run a fishing business. After the divorce, the wife was claim the Harta Sepencarian.<br />Salleh Abas CJ held that the assets must be divided among them although the wife was not contribute to bought that assets. The wife was give an indirect contribution as she responsible to keep the peace of mind of to her husband to run the fishing business with proper sense. The court held that one-third of the assets was divide to the plaintiff and two-third for the defendant. The one-third division is for the indirectly contribution by the plaintiff to support the plaintiff’s fishing business.[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of Eleven(11)]higher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3812918224639581886.post-37256688433367744282009-05-27T07:16:00.001+08:002009-05-27T07:16:26.590+08:00which the civil court has preside :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW UndergraduateSample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050612<br /><br />Yes, the civil court have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims. It has been proved by two leading cases <span style="color:#ff0000;">which the civil court has preside</span> over claims for Harta Sepencarian. The case is Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khatthum and Boto v Jaafar.<br />In Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khalthum, the spouses had bought a matrimonial home for RM50,000. The husband contribute RM40,000 and the wife RM10,000. The house was named under the wife. After the dissolution of marriage or divorce, the husband apply that the house to be divided equally among them. The wife was not agree to this claims. The court held that the asset must be divided equally among them.In Boto v Jaafar, the husband and wife was marry in 1966. During the subsistence of marriage, they was bought a house, a piece of land, four fishing boats and one fish stall. The husband run a fishing business. After the divorce, the wife was claim the Harta Sepencarian.<br />Salleh Abas CJ held that the assets must be divided among them although the wife was not contribute to bought that assets. The wife was give an indirect contribution as she responsible to keep the peace of mind of to her husband to run the fishing business with proper sense. The court held that one-third of the assets was divide to the plaintiff and two-third for the defendant. The one-third division is for the indirectly contribution by the plaintiff to support the plaintiff’s fishing business.[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of Eleven(11)]higher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3812918224639581886.post-74217917066901061822009-05-27T07:13:00.000+08:002009-05-27T07:14:33.976+08:00has been proved : USIM Third Year LAW Undergraduate:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW UndergraduateSample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050612<br /><br />Yes, the civil court have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims. It <span style="color:#ff0000;">has been proved</span> by two leading cases which the civil court has preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian. The case is Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khatthum and Boto v Jaafar.<br />In Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khalthum, the spouses had bought a matrimonial home for RM50,000. The husband contribute RM40,000 and the wife RM10,000. The house was named under the wife. After the dissolution of marriage or divorce, the husband apply that the house to be divided equally among them. The wife was not agree to this claims. The court held that the asset must be divided equally among them.In Boto v Jaafar, the husband and wife was marry in 1966. During the subsistence of marriage, they was bought a house, a piece of land, four fishing boats and one fish stall. The husband run a fishing business. After the divorce, the wife was claim the Harta Sepencarian.<br />Salleh Abas CJ held that the assets must be divided among them although the wife was not contribute to bought that assets. The wife was give an indirect contribution as she responsible to keep the peace of mind of to her husband to run the fishing business with proper sense. The court held that one-third of the assets was divide to the plaintiff and two-third for the defendant. The one-third division is for the indirectly contribution by the plaintiff to support the plaintiff’s fishing business.[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of Eleven(11)]higher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3812918224639581886.post-47706020930358078132009-05-27T07:10:00.001+08:002009-05-27T07:10:43.246+08:00the civil court have :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW UndergraduateSample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050612<br /><br />Yes, <span style="color:#ff0000;">the civil court have</span> the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims. It has been proved by two leading cases which the civil court has preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian. The case is Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khatthum and Boto v Jaafar.<br />In Roberts @ Kamarulzaman v Umi Khalthum, the spouses had bought a matrimonial home for RM50,000. The husband contribute RM40,000 and the wife RM10,000. The house was named under the wife. After the dissolution of marriage or divorce, the husband apply that the house to be divided equally among them. The wife was not agree to this claims. The court held that the asset must be divided equally among them.In Boto v Jaafar, the husband and wife was marry in 1966. During the subsistence of marriage, they was bought a house, a piece of land, four fishing boats and one fish stall. The husband run a fishing business. After the divorce, the wife was claim the Harta Sepencarian.<br />Salleh Abas CJ held that the assets must be divided among them although the wife was not contribute to bought that assets. The wife was give an indirect contribution as she responsible to keep the peace of mind of to her husband to run the fishing business with proper sense. The court held that one-third of the assets was divide to the plaintiff and two-third for the defendant. The one-third division is for the indirectly contribution by the plaintiff to support the plaintiff’s fishing business.[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of Eleven(11)]higher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3812918224639581886.post-56958808253706724192009-05-27T06:59:00.000+08:002009-05-27T07:00:03.073+08:00the court held, the case retried:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW UndergraduateSample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050617<br /><br />This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, <span style="color:#ff0000;">the court held, the case retried</span> before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]higher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3812918224639581886.post-17502263059851692892009-05-26T18:19:00.001+08:002009-05-26T18:19:44.990+08:00must trial with witness:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW UndergraduateSample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050617<br /><br />This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and <span style="color:#ff0000;">must trial with witness</span>. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]higher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3812918224639581886.post-41384227745116076692009-05-26T18:14:00.000+08:002009-05-26T18:15:08.789+08:00on the influenced by the Black Magic :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW UndergraduateSample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050617<br /><br />This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined <span style="color:#ff0000;">on the influenced by the Black Magic</span> and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]higher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3812918224639581886.post-69335835208288877172009-05-26T18:11:00.000+08:002009-05-26T18:12:07.627+08:00the lower court must determined :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW UndergraduateSample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050617<br /><br />This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that <span style="color:#ff0000;">the lower court must determined</span> on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]higher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3812918224639581886.post-72558954574063335202009-05-26T18:07:00.000+08:002009-05-26T18:08:31.214+08:00The court give judgement :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW UndergraduateSample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050617<br /><br />This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. <span style="color:#ff0000;">The court give judgement</span> that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]higher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3812918224639581886.post-31570456267907458662009-05-26T16:33:00.002+08:002009-05-26T16:34:19.756+08:00they appealed to appeal court:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW UndergraduateSample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050617<br /><br />This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but <span style="color:#ff0000;">they appealed to appeal court.</span> The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]higher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3812918224639581886.post-71421695305258566402009-05-26T16:30:00.000+08:002009-05-26T16:31:38.802+08:00that talaq is consider as 3 talaq:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW UndergraduateSample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050617<br /><br />This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held <span style="color:#ff6666;">that talaq is consider as 3 talaq</span> but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]higher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3812918224639581886.post-78332859122473762182009-05-26T10:02:00.001+08:002009-05-26T10:02:59.905+08:00Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW UndergraduateSample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050617<br /><br />This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, <span style="color:#ff0000;">the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic</span>. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]higher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3812918224639581886.post-40108267962768126152009-05-26T09:58:00.001+08:002009-05-26T09:58:59.853+08:00the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW UndergraduateSample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050617<br /><br />This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether <span style="color:#ff0000;">the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs</span> or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]higher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3812918224639581886.post-14652872679992493822009-05-25T14:18:00.001+08:002009-05-25T14:18:39.153+08:00The issue here whether:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW UndergraduateSample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050617<br /><br />This case is about the husband pronouce talaq to his wife by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. <span style="color:#ff0000;">The issue here whether</span> the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]higher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3812918224639581886.post-59968103898481255952009-05-25T14:14:00.000+08:002009-05-25T14:15:31.428+08:00husband pronouce talaq to his wife: World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW UndergraduateSample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050617<br /><br />This case is about <span style="color:#ff0000;">the husband pronouce talaq to his wife</span> by saying “I divorced you. I divorced you. I divorced you”. The issue here whether the pronouncement of 3 Talaq at once, can consider as 3 talaqs or one talaq only. According to Hanafi sect, it fell under 1 talaq, but Shafii sect, 3 talaq. But, in this case, the Husband alleged that he is had induced by Black Magic. So, it is not under his proper sense. The Syariah Court held that talaq is consider as 3 talaq but they appealed to appeal court. The court give judgement that the lower court must determined on the influenced by the Black Magic and must trial with witness. So, the court held, the case retried before another kadi/judge.[Marks earned: One Point Four (1.4) out of Ten]higher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3812918224639581886.post-59184050815597389492009-05-24T22:10:00.001+08:002009-05-24T22:10:48.860+08:00which is discussing it in big room :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW UndergraduateSample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050629<br />The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.<br /><br />For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.<br /><br />Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.<br /><br />As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which <span style="color:#ff0000;">is discussing it in big room</span> to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.<br />[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]higher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3812918224639581886.post-32567248715757376822009-05-24T22:05:00.000+08:002009-05-24T22:06:54.376+08:00which is discussing in little room:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW UndergraduateSample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050629<br /><br />The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.<br /><br />For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.<br /><br />Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.<br /><br />As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which <span style="color:#ff0000;">is discussing in little room</span> rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.<br />[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]higher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3812918224639581886.post-34735293119152124672009-05-24T22:02:00.000+08:002009-05-24T22:03:35.585+08:00the civil court also have the jurisdiction:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW UndergraduateSample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050629<br /><br />The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.<br /><br />For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.<br /><br />Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.<br /><br />As a conclusion, <span style="color:#ff0000;">the civil court also have the jurisdiction</span> to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.<br />[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]higher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3812918224639581886.post-516349611113898582009-05-24T21:59:00.000+08:002009-05-24T22:00:27.179+08:00give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIMSample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050629<br /><br />The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.<br /><br />For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.<br /><br />Therefore, the civil court will give <span style="color:#ff0000;">the claims</span> for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since<span style="color:#ff0000;"> it is</span> involving Hukum Syara’.<br /><br />As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.<br />[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]higher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3812918224639581886.post-34646823171465753642009-05-24T21:53:00.001+08:002009-05-24T21:55:48.882+08:00towards acquiring of the assets :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW UndergraduateSample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050629<br /><br />The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.<br /><br />For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour <span style="color:#ff0000;">towards acquiring of the assets</span>.<br /><br />Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.<br /><br />As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.<br />[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]higher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3812918224639581886.post-54789046447431868942009-05-24T21:49:00.000+08:002009-05-24T21:50:52.808+08:00arbour:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW UndergraduateSample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050629<br /><br />The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.<br /><br />For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or <span style="color:#ff0000;">larbour </span>towards acquiring of the assets.<br /><br />Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.<br />As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.<br />[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]higher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3812918224639581886.post-50777415800907082902009-05-24T21:42:00.000+08:002009-05-24T21:47:21.537+08:00in contribute her husband in money:World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW UndergraduateSample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050629<br /><br />The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.<br /><br />For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active <span style="color:#ff0000;">in contribute her husband in money,</span> property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’. As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims. [Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]higher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3812918224639581886.post-88899405367501000172009-05-23T22:42:00.000+08:002009-05-23T22:43:30.424+08:00if she did not active :World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW UndergraduateSample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050629<br /><br />The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.<br /><br />For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired <span style="color:#ff0000;">if she did not active</span> in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.<br />Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.<br /><br />As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.<br />[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]higher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3812918224639581886.post-4332083452422779562009-05-23T22:39:00.001+08:002009-05-23T22:39:40.301+08:00larbour: World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Third Year LAW UndergraduateSample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050629<br /><br />The civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims however it is discussing in little room. This is because, the equality of division property jointly acquired between civil and syariah court is different.<br /><br />For instance, the civil court may give the wife more than husband the division of property jointly acquired if the wife actively contribute her husband in money, property, or <span style="color:#ff0000;">larbour</span> towards acquiring of the assets. The civil court also may not give the wife any division of property jointly acquired if she did not active in contribute her husband in money, property, or larbour towards acquiring of the assets.<br />Therefore, the civil court will give the claims for ‘Harta Sepencarian’ among Muslims to Syariah Court first since it is involving Hukum Syara’.<br /><br />As a conclusion, the civil court also have the jurisdiction to preside over claims for Harta Sepencarian among Muslims which is discussing in little room rather than Syariah Court which is discussing it in big room to ensure the equality of division property jointly acquired among Muslims.<br />[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of 11 marks]higher education in Malaysiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04583736806265278111noreply@blogger.com