Announcement Until today (3 May 2009) the inefficient & CORRUPT , MOHE never answered MY QUERIES!!!

THE MOHE IS PROTECTED BY THE POWERS THAT BE (BPA & THE KSN KNOW ABOUT THIS BUT SHUT THEIR EYES), SHIELDING USIM & MMU WHICH FOOL THE PUBLIC AT LARGE BY MANIPULATING & INFLATING MARKS. UNTIL WHEN WILL YOU CONTINUE YOUR SCAMS?????? HAVE YOU NO SHAME, PRETENDING TO BE THE CUSTODIAN OF INTEGRITY?????

Mind Boggling & Illogical=MOHE finds "Senat USIM bertindak wajar"??????

From:
To: myk@mohe.gov.my
Cc: tam@bpa.jpm.my; sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my; radinumx@mohe.gov.my
Sent: Monday, March 9, 2009 11:39:46 AM
Subject: Jawapan surat rujukan JPT (A) 1000/011/011/04 (5) Datuk Prof Mohd Yusof bin Kasim,

Merujuk kepada surat rujukan JPT (A) 1000/011/011/04 (5), pada perenggan dua berikut: “2. Sebagaimana Puan sedia maklum, Jabatan ini telah menerima aduan Puan mengenai isu Puan dituduh tidak efisyen kerana enggan bekerjasama dalam menilai semula markah pelajar yang mengikuti kelas Puan pada 15 Jun 2008. Jabatan ini melalui suratnya kepada Naib Canselor Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM) rujukan JPT (A) 1000/011/011/04 (1) bertarikh 27 Jun 2008 telahpun melakukan siasatan ke atas isu seperti di atas dan mendapati bahawa Senat USIM telah bertindak wajar atas kapasitinya selaku authority tertinggi dalam hal ehwal akademik dan mempunyai hak untuk memohon markah pelajar dinilai semula.”

Saya ingin membetulkan kekhilafan fakta dalam perenggan di atas. Saya tidak membuat aduan pada 15 Jun 2008 tetapi membuat aduan pada 10 Jun 2008. Berkenaan dengan dapatan di atas yang Jabatan terima iaitu “Senat USIM telah bertindak wajar atas kapasitinya selaku authority tertinggi dalam hal ehwal akademik dan mempunyai hak untuk memohon markah pelajar dinilai semula”, sila jelaskan perkara-perkara di bawah selewat-lewatnya pada 16 Mac 2009 kepada:
My email address & correspondence address.

Perkara-perkara yang Jabatan perlu jelaskan:
1. Memberi tarikh sebenar dapatan tersebut didapati oleh Jabatan (kindly explain the exact date the department decided and concluded that, the USIM Senate had “bertindak wajar” and had the right to request that the marking be re-evaluated).
2. On what basis does the department conclude that the Senate had “bertindak wajar”?
3. Who vests to the senate the right to request that the marking be re-evaluated?
3. What are the rights of the Senate?
4. Provide the justification(s) for the Senate to order the re-evaluation of my marking.
5. What is the power conferred to the Senate to order the re-evaluation of the marks? Cite the legal authority/clause empowering the Senate to order the re-evaluation of my marking?
6. Who confers the power to the Senate as the highest authority in academic matters to order the re-evaluation of my marking?
7. Explain The National Higher Education Strategic Plan.
8. Does the power exercised by the Senate of USIM violate the abovementioned National Higher Education Strategic Plan? If it does not violate such Plan, provide the justifications.
Harap Maklum. Terima kasih.

MOHE’s SECOND OFFICIAL REPLY

Rujukan Kami : JPT (A) 1000/011/011/04 ( 7 )
Tarikh : 6 Mac 2009

Puan,


ADUAN MENGENAI ISU KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP PENSYARAH DI UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA

Dengan hormatnya saya merujuk kepada e-mel puan bertarikh 3 Mac 2009 dan surat Jabatan ini rujukan JPT (A) 1000/011/011/04 (5) bertarikh 2 Februari
2009 adalah berkaitan.

2. Jabatan ini mengambil maklum akan isi kandungan emel puan tersebut
mengenai tuduhan lisan yang didakwa dibuat oleh Timbalan Naib Canselor
(Akademik & Antarabangsa) Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM) terhadap
puan. Walau bagaimanapun, pertikaian yang timbul adalah melibatkan antara
puan dan pegawai USIM tersebut. Justeru, adalah tidak wajar sekiranya
Jabatan ini dikehendaki menjawab perkara tersebut bagi pihak beliau.

3. Sehubungan itu, adalah lebih elok sekiranya perkara ini dibawa
berunding dengan pihak USIM.


Sekian, terima kasih.


“BERKHIDMAT UNTUK NEGARA”


Yang ikhlas,

(DATUK PROF. MOHD YUSOF BIN KASIM)
Timbalan Ketua Pengarah (Sektor IPTA)
Jabatan Pengajian Tinggi
Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia



s.k.


KP, JPT



Y.Bhg. Dato’ Prof. Dr. Abdul Shukor b. Hj. Husin
Naib Canselor
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia
Bandar Baru Nilai
71800 Nilai
NEGERI SEMBILAN

No. Tel : 06-7988013
No. Faks : 06-7941143


Tuan Hj. Addenan bin Hj. Abdul Rahman
Pendaftar
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM)
Bandar Baru Nilai
71800 Nilai
NEGERI SEMBILAN

No. Tel :06-7988101
No. Fax :06-7993843

My first reply to MOHE's official letter

----- Forwarded Message ----
From:
To: myk@mohe.gov.my
Cc: radinumx@mohe.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2009 11:12:14 AM
Subject: Fw: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah

Datuk Professor Mohd Yusof bin Kasim

Merujuk surat Datuk bertarikh 3 februari 2009, Datuk tidak menjawab aduan saya di bawah yang telah dibuat kepada Dato Radin Umar. Memandangkan Dato Radin Umar, mula-mula serahkan aduan saya kepada Prof Rujhan dan kemudian kepada Prof Datuk Mohd Yusof bin Kasim, jadi saya tiada pilihan lain but to revert to Prof Datuk Mohd Yusof bin Kasim, to request that your goodself reply to my query. Memandangkan aduan telah dibuat hampir sembilan bulan lalu, sila berikan jawapan selewat-lewatnya 8 Februari 2009.
Terima kasih .

Yang Benar

----- Forwarded Message ----
From:
To: radinumx@mohe.gov.my
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 2:56:28 PM
Subject: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah

Assalamualaikum Dato I went to see Prof Dato Dr Muhammad Muda, TNC (Academic) today at 12.30 pm.

He shouted at me and said the following to me:

1. You are a failure.Your effort goes down the drain because your students fail .
The government can spend a lot of money training but it's no use if the students fail.
2. You are not suitable for our university. You are at the wrong place.
Our university rates our students based on their development.
(Before he made his remark, I explained to him that I grade the exam papers based on the merit and cogency of the answer based on the marking scheme).
3. You should leave our university. (I asked him to issue a letter that he wants me to quit teaching as I am not suitable for the university)
4. Can your students understand your teaching as a majority of them failed?
5. What do you think of our students?You look down at our students!

Dato, I am not going to the upper management of USIM for justice, as the
TNC(Academic) himself had asked me to leave the university.

Dato, I am asking for your help to assist me as I did not do anything wrong.
I marked the papers based on merit and cogency. I am truly victimised here
and the insults and demand to quit by Dr Muhammad Muda today is truly an affront to me and the straw that breaks the camel's back.

Please Dato, I ask for justice.

Yours sincerely
--- On Wed, 6/11/08, Professor Dato' Dr Ir Radin Umar wrote:
From: Professor Dato' Dr Ir Radin Umar radinumx@mohe.gov.my
Subject: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
To: "
Cc: "mrujhan" Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2008, 7:42 AM

Prof Rujhan akan menangani nya dengan berhemah.
________________________________
Professor Dato' Radin Umar
Director General
Department of Higher Education
Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia
Level 3, Block E9, Parcel E
62505 Putrajaya MALAYSIA
> Dato'
> Sy mohon bantuan Dato' kerana sy baru 6 bulan
bekerja di sini dan sy
> memang tidak diperlakukan dengan adil
meskipun saya berkata benar.
> Terima kasih atas nasihat Dato'.
>
> Professor Dato' Dr Ir Radin Umar radinumx@mohe.gov.my
wrote:
>
> lakukan yang betul demi kebenaran.
Saya yakin Pengurusan USIM akan
> menanganinya secara adil
> ________________________________
> Professor Dato' Radin Umar
> Director General
> Department of Higher Education
> Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia
> Level 3, Block E9, Parcel E
> 62505 Putrajaya MALAYSIA
>
>> Terima kasih Dato, saya masih dalam ketakutan.
Diharap dapat menolong
>> saya.
>>
>> Professor Dato' Dr Ir Radin Umar wrote:
>> Assalamualaikum,
>>
>> Terima aksih. saya akan minta Prof Rujhan siasat
dan membetulkan jika
>> terdapat penyelewengan.
>>
>> Salam.
>>
>> ________________________________
>> Professor Dato' Radin Umar
>> Director General
>> Department of Higher Education
>> Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia
>> Level 3, Block E9, Parcel E
>> 62505 Putrajaya MALAYSIA
>>
>>> Askm Dato'
>>>
>>> Saya , Pensyarah Di USIM. Saya
>>> telah dipaksa memanipulasi markah pelajar dan
meluluskan pelajar kerana hanya dua pelajar lulus. Saya tidak mengubah markah kerana saya telah memberi markah dengan adil mengikut skema jawapan dan telah membuat kelas tambahan sebanyak 6-8jam
sebelum peperiksaan untuk memperkasa
pengetahuan pelajar.
>>>
>>> Saya telah menerima surat daripada Dekan Fakulti Syariah
& Undang2 menyatakan fakulti kecewa kerana saya enggan bekerjasama "memanipulasi markah" (my understanding, the exact wordings were
"melihat/menyemak semula secara menyeluruh kaedah dan sistem penilaian yang dilakukan".)
>>>
>>> Dekan juga menuduh saya tidak efficient dalam pengajaran saya.
>>>
>>> Dato', saya mohon bantuan pihak Dato' kerana saya dihukum kerana enggan memanipulasi markah pelajar agar ramai lulus kerana ianya tidak beretika.No telefon saya ialah
>>> Terima kasih.
>>>

After much ding dong I received an official reply from MOHE in February 2009 (nearly 8 mths after I complained)

Rujukan kami: JPT (A) 1000/011/011/04 (5)
Tarikh: 3 Februari 2009

Puan,
ADUAN MENGENAI ISU KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP PENSYARAH DI UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA

2. Sebagaimana Puan sedia maklum, Jabatan ini telah menerima aduan Puan mengenai isu Puan dituduh tidak efisyen kerana enggan bekerjasama dalam menilai semula markah pelajar yang mengikuti kelas Puan pada 15 Jun 2008. Jabatan ini melalui suratnya kepada Naib Canselor Universiti Islam Sains Malaysia (USIM) rujukan JPT (A) 1000/011/011/04 bertarikh 27 Jun 2008 telahpun melakukan siasatan ke atas isu seperti tersebut di atas dan mendapati bahawa Senat USIM telah bertindak wajar atas kapasitinya selaku authority tertinggi dalam hal ehwal akademik dan mempunyai hak untuk memohon markah pelajar dinilai semula.

3. Jabatan ini sekali lagi menerima aduan dari Puan pada 3 Disember 2008 mengenai isu ketidakadilan yang berlaku terhadap Puan sehingga mendorong Puan meletakkan jawatan selaku Pensyarah Universiti Gred DS45 berkuatkuasa mulai 18 Disember 2008 melalui surat Puan kepada Pengurusan USIM bertarikh 17 November 2008. Jabatan ini telah sekali lagi meminta laporan maklum balas Pengurusan Tertinggi USIM mengenai perkara ini melalui percakapan lisan antara saya dan Tuan Addenan bin Hj Abdul Rahman, Pendaftar USIM. Jabatan ini telah meneliti laporan tersebut dan mendapati perkara-perkara berikut:

a) Urusan permohonan perletakan jawatan Puan
adalah mengikut prosedur yang telah ditetapkan
oleh USIM.

b) USIM berhak untuk menerima atau menolak
permohonan perletakan jawatan Puan; dan

c) USIM mempunyai kuasa autonomi dalam hal ehwal
pengurusan dan pentadbiran akademik Universiti.

4. Setelah mengambil kira kesemua aspek perbincangan antara saya, Puan dan juga Pengurusan USIM, saya mendapati bahawa tidak timbul sebarang salah laku dari aspek perundangan berhubung kes Puan. Sepertimana Puan sedia maklum, Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi (KPT) tidak mempunyai sebarang kuasa atas aspek pengambilan, pelantikan serta perletakan jawatan sebarang urusan perjawatan akademik Universiti. Sebarang perkara lanjut mengenai perkara ini perlulah dirujuk secara terus dengan pihak Pengurusan USIM sendiri.

5. Adalah diharapkan Puan mengambil maklum dengan penjelasan dan pendirian KPT berhubung perkara ni. Saya ingin mengucapkan berbanyak terima kasih atas sumbangan Puan kepada pengajian tinggi selama ini dan berdoa agar Puan akan terus maju jaya dalam apa jua bidang kelak. Kerjasama dan perhatian Puan dalam perkara ini amat saya hargai dan didahului dengan ucapan terima kasih.

Sekian,

“BERKHIDMAT UNTUK NEGARA”

Yang ikhlas,

(DATUK PROF. MOHD YUSOF BIN KASIM)
Timbalan Ketua Pengarah (Sektor IPTA)
Jabatan Pengajian Tinggi
Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia

Meeting with Datuk Prof Mohd. Yusof Kasim

This person had the nerve to say these things to me:
1. What do you want me to do? (Prof Dato Radin wrote in his email that this guy had been following my case, if he had been following the case, why did he ask me that question.)
2. The poor results is a reflection of your poor teaching (Please look at the samples of the answers given, the students' poor command of the English language signifies a weakness beyond my control. These students learnt English since they were in Standard One.Furthermore the midsem & final exam questions are easy!)

Sample answer USIM undergraduate 1060558
4 instances of Talaq Bain Sughra.
1. The husband pronounce the wife not get the consummet from the husband, the wife not the period iddah after the divorce.
2. The husband divorce the wife time period the wife must After 3x suci from it For the husband ruju’.
3. The wife in the hamil must born the baby for the husband ruju’ him.

Sample answer by USIM undergraduate 1060595
The instances of Talaq Bain Kubra is the husband pronounced the divorce during the wife pregnant and already consumption When the husband divorce her wife during the pregnant the talaq not effected until the born of baby. The husband can revocked divorce during period of pregnants.

a. I said to this Prof that I even gave the students the exam questions before they sat for their exam!! Therefore I demanded from MOHE its stand, whether my standard is too HIGH FOR UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA. If my standard is too HIGH, than my conscience is clear, it is USIM which has low standards!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!b. I also demanded MOHE's decision as to whether Prof Muhamad Muda had the right to condemn me to be a FAILURE & that I SHOULD LEAVE UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA.c. I also informed him that the NC, Prof Dr Abd Shukor Husin accused me of mempunyai hubungan with a Dean of UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA.d. I demanded from MOHE, to restore justice to me as I had been victimised and I have reported to MOHE since June 2008.

Appointment to see Deputy DG HE, MOHE

From:
To: myk@mohe.gov.my myk@mohe.gov.my
Cc: "radinumx@mohe.gov.my" radinumx@mohe.gov.my
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 10:21:17 +0800
Subject: Fwd: Re: Fw: Appointment to see Dato

Askm Datuk
I would like to make an urgent request to see you regarding my being victimised at USIM.
Yang Benar